The keys
nuevo
Generated with AI
nuevo
Generated with AI
“Trump’s name appears thousands and thousands of times in the Epstein Archives. It is very disturbing.” This is the complaint that the Democratic congressman from California has been repeating since the middle of the month, Ted Lieuwho maintains that these documents include “deeply disturbing accusations” of sexual abuse of minors by the Republican.
Lieu, who demands total transparency and the full publication of the files, insists that in these files there is a complaint concrete of a witness who called the FBI to say that a woman told her that Trump and Epstein raped her when she was about 13 or 14 years old.
The alleged victim found dead and the Justice Department never interviewed the witness.

The first time that the Democratic legislator made this serious accusation against the president was on February 11 in a tenso riirrafe with fiscal general Pam Bondi during a hearing of the House Judiciary Committee.
The session was convened to examine the management of the Department of Justice (DOJ) in the publication of millions of pages, videos and images linked to the billionaire pedophile, in compliance with the Epstein Files Transparency Act, approved last year.

Democratic Congressman from California, Ted Lieu.
Reuters
Democrats and some victims maintain that The Trump Government has dosed the information, retaining some of the most sensitive materialswhile the White House insists that the deadlines and limits established by law are being respected.
Bondi ‘loses it’
In this context, Lieu projected An old video showing Epstein chatting and socializing with Trump at a partyan image that has already become a symbol of the relationship between the two.
From that piece, the congressman He asked Bondi if he was aware of minors present at any party. in which Trump coincided with Epstein.
Bondi reacted to the offensive by closing ranks around the president and emphasizing that the question was “ridiculous” because “There is no evidence that Donald Trump committed a crime” in relation to the ‘Epstein case’. The attorney general stressed that, although the Republican’s name appears numerous times in the files, no charges have been filed and no prosecutor has considered that there is sufficient basis to charge him.
Far from lowering the tone, Lieu went further: he assured that Bondi had just lied under oath stating that there was no evidence of possible criminality.
As support, he exhibited parts of a statement from un witness who called the FBI to report that he had met a woman who claimed to have been raped by Trump and Epstein as a minor, and who She was later found dead in an alleged suicide. which, according to the witness, raised quite a few doubts.
That accusation crossed a red line for Bondi, who She replied visibly irritated with “never accuse me of a crime again.”a phrase that has circulated virally on networks and media as a symbol of the tension of said session.
Two days later, the Democratic congressman returned to the fray in X.
The Democrat once again demanded that the DOJ immediately subpoena that witness and she directly questioned Bondi, emphasizing that she already knows that FBI document because “she began to spy in a disturbing way” which files the congressmen were consulting.
The White House version
Meanwhile, the DOJ and the White House have tried to put various firewalls to the most explosive interpretations of the immense number of published documents linked to the pedophile.
In a statement, the DOJ warned that the enormous volume of files also includes false or fraudulently presented images, documents and videos, some of them with “sensational and unverified” accusations against Trump.
He official message insists that many of these claims are unfounded and have not passed the basic corroboration filters, and maintains that, if they had a minimum of legal credibility, they would have already given rise to formal investigations or charges.
This line of argument has been replicated by the White House, which presents the publication of dubious materials as proof of transparency, but also as an example of how unverified information can be politically “weaponized” against the president.
Organizations of Epstein survivors and Democratic congressmen They reject that reading and accuse the Trump Administration of “muddying the water” with irrelevant or unverified documents while keeping other potentially incriminating pieces under lock and key.
They maintain that the partial release, warnings about false material and Trump’s closed defense are part of a strategy to dilute the impact of the files and avoid accountability for possible errors or omissions in the original investigation.
“The Department of Justice has confirmed that There were more than 1,000 victims of Epstein’s pedophile sex trafficking operation. Countries around the world, such as France, are taking action against perpetrators. Except in the United States,
Pam Bondi has not held any man accountable,” Lieu reproached this week on his networks.
You may also like
-
Dani Miret, Joventut coach: "With Ricky I won the lottery"
-
Trump demands that Starmer “not lose control” of the island of Diego García in the Indian Ocean in the face of a possible attack by Iran
-
eight skiers found dead and one missing after being hit by avalanche
-
Tow truck driver in Minnesota returns vehicles after ICE arrests: families regain hope
-
Russia denounces that Ukraine uses Dutch pilots in its fighters and threatens: they will be “legitimate targets”
